📝
Education

Best README Templates for Repos with No Actual Code

Because your ideas deserve better documentation than your implementation

A well-structured README template can make a theoretical project look more professional than projects with actual working code.
đź‘‘ #1 Pick

Make-a-README

Interactive README generator that makes placeholder projects look intentional

All 5 recommendations

Est. prices as of 14 Mar 2026

#1 · GitHub Community · Crowd Favorite

Make-a-README

Free

Interactive README generator that makes placeholder projects look intentional

  • âś“ Web-based editor with live preview
  • âś“ Generates sections for badges, features, and installation
  • âś“ Perfect for repos that don't exist yet
  • âś— Almost too easy—doesn't encourage thinking about actual content
#2 · RichardLitt · Hidden Gem

Standard-Readme

Free

Opinionated spec that treats every repo like it's the next Linux kernel

  • âś“ Strict formatting rules make empty repos look organized
  • âś“ Community-backed specification
  • âś“ Includes metadata, versioning, and maintainers sections
  • âś— Overly rigid for projects that might never launch
#3 · Sindre Sorhus

Awesome README

Free

The gold standard for making abandoned projects look like active communities

  • âś“ Comprehensive checklist of professional sections
  • âś“ Includes badges, screenshots, and demo sections (even if they're placeholders)
  • âś“ Widely respected template in open-source
  • âś— Requires careful thought about what goes in each section—might expose lack of planning
#4 · PurpleBooth

PurpleBooth README Template

Free

Detailed template that works best for projects with abstract concepts

  • âś“ Includes built-in deployment instructions section
  • âś“ Contributors and acknowledgments sections add legitimacy
  • âś“ Great for concept-stage projects
  • âś— Assumes you'll actually deploy something
#5 · OpenSource Collective

READEME by Coding Standards

Free

Academic approach that treats every repo like a research paper

  • âś“ Includes abstract, methodology, and results sections
  • âś“ Makes theoretical projects sound credible
  • âś“ Perfect for research-adjacent vaporware
  • âś— Over-engineered for side projects that don't exist